Data

2015/16 Cycle Data as of 3/11/16

Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1402,948-7.0%140–1444,0491.3%145–1496,338 3.1%150–1548,095-3.2%155–1598,170-1.1%160–1646,5696.2%165–1694,35812.9%170–174 2,04211.5%175–18052523.5%Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1402,948-7.0%140 618-7.8%1418077.5%1427320.1%1439156.0%144977-0.6%145881-11.1%1461,3738.0%147 1,060-16.3%1481,40129.1%1491,6235.9%1501,295-18.1%1511,5853.2%1521,8818.5%153 1,638-10.4%1541,6961.0%1551,615-11.6%1561,80512.4%1571,501-4.6%1581,8484.4%159 1,401-5.4%1601,55235.5%1611

2015/16 Cycle Data as of 3/4/16

Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1402,808-6.6%140–1443,8752.1%145–1496,115 4.4%150–1547,879-2.5%155–1597,995-1.0%160–1646,5026.5%165–1694,32912.8%170–174 2,03011.5%175–18052323.6%Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1402,808-6.6%140 582-8.3%1417808.5%1426980.6%1438857.0%1449301.2%145842-11.2%1461,32510.8%147 1,016-16.5%1481,35331.9%1491,5797.4%1501,255-18.0%1511,5394.1%1521,8169.0%153 1,597-9.7%1541,6722.4%1551,571-11.7%1561,75812.5%1571,469-4.4%1581,8164.3%159 1,381-5.2%1601,53736.1%1611,

2015/16 Cycle Data as of 2/19/2016

Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1402,178-8.1%140–1442,9615.1%145–1494,723 3.1%150–1546,368-3.7%155–1596,616-1.6%160–1645,8236.6%165–1694,05213.5%170–174 1,94311.5%175–18050621.9%Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1402,178-8.1%140 405-8.4%14166310.7%1424721.7%14374710.7%1446746.0%145667-15.1%1461,01815.0%147 860-17.1%14897732.4%1491,2015.7%1501,036-20.9%1511,2025.5%1521,4127.1%1531,274 -11.9%1541,4443.0%1551,267-13.2%1561,46916.1%1571,183-6.4%1581,5282.5%1591,169 -6.0%1601,36743.9%1611,1

2015/16 Cycle Data as of 1/29/16

Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1401,718-9.2%140–1442,2464.5%145–1493,467 0.9%150–1544,849-4.2%155–1595,222-2.3%160–1644,8495.8%165–1693,57513.9%170–174 1,75510.8%175–18047322.2%Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1401,718-9.2%140 327-4.4%1414766.3%142364-0.3%14356110.0%1445186.8%145482-19.5%1467218.1%147659 -16.7%14871730.8%1498886.7%150768-19.6%151869-4.1%1521,0827.3%1531,032-6.0%154 1,0980.1%155970-16.8%1561,16313.9%1579590.9%1581,2160.2%159914-6.5%1601,11237.8% 161981-12.6%162746-24.

Which Law Schools Accepted the Most Transfer Students?

2015/16 Cycle Data as of 1/8/16

Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1401,401-10.8%140–1441,7104.0%145–1492,559 -1.5%150–1543,567-4.7%155–1593,874-1.0%160–1643,7955.6%165–1692,93812.7%170–174 1,52510.2%175–18039914.3%Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1401,401-10.8%140 264-4.7%1413659.0%142280-0.4%1434165.9%1443857.5%145341-29.4%1465174.7%147519 -12.5%14852023.2%1496618.9%150592-15.4%151612-10.8%15280210.0%153772-5.7%154789 -2.4%155685-18.8%15685611.6%1577468.6%158924-0.4%159663-3.6%16083732.0%161786 -6.9%162555-27.5%16381

2015/16 Cycle Data as of 12/18/2015

Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1401,150-10.6%140222-5.5%14129615.6%142227 -2.6%14332511.3%14433123.5%145259-33.2%1464029.5%147416-0.2%1483634.314951411.3% 15046911.7%151432-22.4%15260017.6%1536144.6%1546096.8%155497-17.3%1566466.6%157 60824.3%1587226.2%159460-7.3%16066331.8%1616535.3%162396-31.0%16361443.1%164681 13.3%16540315.8%166450-22.0%16752147.6%168364-2.9%16956544.1%17033214.9%171297 27.5%1722592.8%17318613.4%17416413.1%175100-3.8%1769146.8%1776927.8%1783559.1% 17916-40.7%1802840.0

Every LSAT score/Number of Applicants/% Change

As of 12/18/2015 Applicants’ LSAT scores have now been expanded to include all scores (to my knowledge for the first time). Per LSAC "Please use the percent-change data with caution, as smaller cell counts may affect the reliability of the percentages." The table below shows the ungrouped high LSAT score of 2016 ABA applicants with the percent change from last year: Highest/LSAT/Number of Applicants/ Pct Chg YTD < 140 1,150 -10.6% 140 222 -5.5% 141 296 15.6% 142 227 -2.6% 143 325 11.3% 144 331

Current Application Data as of 12/11/2015

ABA 2016 Applicant & Application count as if 12/11/2015 versus this time last cycle, of which we had 29% of the applicant pool reported. Highest LSAT# Applicants% Change YTD< 1401,091-11.6%140–1441,3128.6%145–1491,821 -1.9%150–1542,536-1.1%155–1592,7122.0%160–1642,81710.6%165–1692,19115.0%170–174 1,17114.4%175–18032016.8%% Change in applications# SchoolsIncrease of 100% or more-Increase of 50% to 99%4Increase of 40% to 49%2Increase of 30% to 39%2 Increase of 20% to 29%11Increase of 10% to 19%19

Region/Race/Gender data for 2015/16 Cycle

Apologies for the formatting, but here is Region/Race/Gender data at this time in the cycle (12/4) versus last cycle at the same time. RegionApplicants #Applicants %Applications #Applications %Far West1,5951.5%9,688 -8.0%Great Lakes1,808-9.7%10,880-9.1%Midsouth1,6293.2%14,224-2.3%Midwest4764.2% 2,264-1.9%Mountain West6532.7%2,10113.9%New England5912.4%6,3900.4%Northeast 2,1351.6%12,753-5.3%Northwest3565.3%1,292-15.2%South Central1,9105.5%5,4193.1% Southeast2,0161.3%5,852-3.5%Regional Total13,16